<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reading Comprehension Will Make You A Better Programmer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/</link>
	<description>Ye Olde Computer Science Blogge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Molyneux</title>
		<link>http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/comment-page-1/#comment-1835</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Molyneux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 16:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/#comment-1835</guid>
		<description>Fair point Andy.  However, having three more novels under your belt is a little bit more than a casual experience increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point Andy.  However, having three more novels under your belt is a little bit more than a casual experience increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 02:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>&quot;It takes a seasoned literature veteran to extract the detail work from novels that were written by seasoned veterans. To the rest of us, “Moby Dick” may as well be “Snow Crash”.&quot;

This is an odd metric for &quot;seasoned veteran&quot;.  According to wikipedia, Moby Dick was Melville&#039;s sixth novel, where as Snow Crash was Stephenson&#039;s third.  What makes Melville a seasoned veteran at the point he wrote Moby Dick?  Neither were freshman attempts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It takes a seasoned literature veteran to extract the detail work from novels that were written by seasoned veterans. To the rest of us, “Moby Dick” may as well be “Snow Crash”.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is an odd metric for &#8220;seasoned veteran&#8221;.  According to wikipedia, Moby Dick was Melville&#8217;s sixth novel, where as Snow Crash was Stephenson&#8217;s third.  What makes Melville a seasoned veteran at the point he wrote Moby Dick?  Neither were freshman attempts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Montanez</title>
		<link>http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/comment-page-1/#comment-1825</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Montanez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 02:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/#comment-1825</guid>
		<description>Interesting read, one of the main reasons  I code is for the challenge even if its repetative boring work I push myself to write better code. But when it comes to reading code, I latch to the basic syntatical understandings and ingest large segments of code at a time. This allows me to jump into a new language and just develop what ever the client needs done. After all a variable is a variable, push, add, pop, shift, concatination, etc is all the same as finding the pretense, past tense, verds, subject and predicate in a new language to produce a sentence/paragraph/story.

Yet after all that is said and done with projects/code, I couldn&#039;t write to save my life and my reading comprehension as well, because I cant write, I can not protray what I have taken in from the story unless I can draw a picture, not words. Just the irony that english is not longer my primate language, as it once was.

p.s Happy Holidays!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read, one of the main reasons  I code is for the challenge even if its repetative boring work I push myself to write better code. But when it comes to reading code, I latch to the basic syntatical understandings and ingest large segments of code at a time. This allows me to jump into a new language and just develop what ever the client needs done. After all a variable is a variable, push, add, pop, shift, concatination, etc is all the same as finding the pretense, past tense, verds, subject and predicate in a new language to produce a sentence/paragraph/story.</p>
<p>Yet after all that is said and done with projects/code, I couldn&#8217;t write to save my life and my reading comprehension as well, because I cant write, I can not protray what I have taken in from the story unless I can draw a picture, not words. Just the irony that english is not longer my primate language, as it once was.</p>
<p>p.s Happy Holidays!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddharth Mitra</title>
		<link>http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/comment-page-1/#comment-1822</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddharth Mitra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/#comment-1822</guid>
		<description>@Jeremiah

  &quot;When I read well-factored, or well-modularized ....code..&quot;

Sometimes I learn more by just reading 
http://thedailywtf.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeremiah</p>
<p>  &#8220;When I read well-factored, or well-modularized &#8230;.code..&#8221;</p>
<p>Sometimes I learn more by just reading<br />
<a href="http://thedailywtf.com" rel="nofollow">http://thedailywtf.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siddharth Mitra</title>
		<link>http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/comment-page-1/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>Siddharth Mitra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/#comment-1821</guid>
		<description>nice article... 

&quot;Level Zero: .....(reserved for advanced Internet users and high school dropouts).&quot;

lol :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8220;Level Zero: &#8230;..(reserved for advanced Internet users and high school dropouts).&#8221;</p>
<p>lol <img src='http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/comment-page-1/#comment-1819</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 17:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jakevoytko.com/blog/2007/12/22/reading-comprehension-will-make-you-a-better-programmer/#comment-1819</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed that in my (relatively short) time doing freelancing work that deals with other people&#039;s codebases, I&#039;ve become a much better code-reader - and that the skills I&#039;ve gained in that area have translated over into code-writing as well.

When I read (literally) bad code written by other people, it stretches my purely analytical capability - I have to really work to figure out what&#039;s going on.

When I read well-factored, or well-modularized (practically the same thing, depending on language) code written by other people, I pick up on new techniques, language features I wasn&#039;t aware of, new loose patterns for solving classes of problems, etc.

Before I got around to doing this on a regular basis, I probably would have thought that all code-bases sucked.

I have come to have the opinion that one can not really further themselves as a useful developer past a certain point without reading other people&#039;s code - you get stuck in your own stupidity, and your stupid code works because the language you&#039;re using is turing-complete.

Anyhow, nice read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that in my (relatively short) time doing freelancing work that deals with other people&#8217;s codebases, I&#8217;ve become a much better code-reader &#8211; and that the skills I&#8217;ve gained in that area have translated over into code-writing as well.</p>
<p>When I read (literally) bad code written by other people, it stretches my purely analytical capability &#8211; I have to really work to figure out what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>When I read well-factored, or well-modularized (practically the same thing, depending on language) code written by other people, I pick up on new techniques, language features I wasn&#8217;t aware of, new loose patterns for solving classes of problems, etc.</p>
<p>Before I got around to doing this on a regular basis, I probably would have thought that all code-bases sucked.</p>
<p>I have come to have the opinion that one can not really further themselves as a useful developer past a certain point without reading other people&#8217;s code &#8211; you get stuck in your own stupidity, and your stupid code works because the language you&#8217;re using is turing-complete.</p>
<p>Anyhow, nice read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
